Skip to content

Law Office of Yuri Starikov, LLCLaw Office of Yuri Starikov, LLC

157-11 Rockaway Blvd., Suite 209, Jamaica, NY 11434 | yuri@starikovlaw.com | + 1 (347) 871 2759

  • Law Office of Yuri Starikov, LLC
  • About Us
  • Publications
  • Library
    • Legal Writing
    • New Jersey
      • Criminal Law
      • Vehicle and Traffic Law
    • New York
      • Appellate Practice
      • Consumer Debt
      • Contracts
      • Corporate Law
      • Criminal Law
      • Employment Law
      • Foreclosures
      • Landlord-Tenant
      • Real Estate Law
      • Uncontested Divorce
      • Vehicle and Traffic Law
    • Federal
      • Criminal Law
      • Customs & International Trade Law
      • Employment Law
      • Immigration Law
      • Tax Law
      • Trademark Law
Home > 2014 > September > 26 > 28-Day Rule of New Jersey Pretrial Intervention Program
Published September 26, 2014 by Yuri Starikov

28-Day Rule of New Jersey Pretrial Intervention Program

PTIDivesrsionNew Jersey State maintains pretrial intervention program (“PTI”).  The program allows individuals to avoid prosecution for the charges pending against them.  PTI goal is to rehabilitate individuals and return them to the community without criminal conviction.  The program is not for everyone, and has a list of limitations and criteria outlined under N.J.S 2C:43-12.  Additional PTI criteria requirements have been promulgated by the Supreme Court under Rule 3:28, which among other things adds time requirements for PTI submission:

Application for pretrial intervention shall be made at the earliest possible opportunity, including before indictment, but in any event no later than twenty-eight days after indictment. (emphasis added).

Is there anything that can be done by individuals, that are otherwise PTI eligible, but missed the 28-day filing time frame?  One obvious answer is “it depends” on the circumstances of that individual.  The “it depends” phrase also implies that the 28-day rule can be applied flexibly.  The extend of flexibility depends on the prosecutor.

Prosecutor has great discretion to decide whether a defendant should be admitted into PTI.  State v. Wallace, 146 N.J. 576, 582 (N.J. 1996).  The discretion includes prosecutorial consent to apply for PTI “out of time.” State v. Horner, 2012 WL 469721 (App. Div. 2012). (“The prosecutor consented to Pritchett [defendant] applying to PTI out of time …”); see also State v. Ponder, 2011 WL 5838729 (App. Div. 2011) (“State agreed to recommend a sentence of probation and to permit defendant to apply to the PTI program out of time.”), State v. Alvarez, 2009 WL 4250775 (App. Div. 2009) (“prosecutor consented to allow defendant to apply to PTI out of time”).  New Jersey Rules of Court require an application for pretrial intervention to be made no later than twenty-eight days after indictment. R. 3:28(h).  Late filing alone, however, is not a reason to reject the PTI application under New Jersey law.  Prosecutor and PTI director are encouraged to consider “an individual defendant’s features that bear on his or her amenability to rehabilitation.” State v. Negran, 178 N.J. 73, 80 (N.J. 2003).

For example, PTI applicant may desire to pursue a lifestyle which is free of drugs and in harmony with laws.  PTI applicant may also rely on privilege to drive (which can be lost if convicted) as means to provide income for him- or herself and/or his/her family.  If charges are drug-related, self-enrollment of PTI applicant into rehabilitation program is a factor for prosecutor/PTI director to consider.

Legislative purpose of the PTI, further gives prosecutor flexibility of one’s application into the program.  “The primary purpose of [PTI] is to assist in the rehabilitation of worthy defendants, and, in the process, to spare them the rigors of the criminal justice system.” State v. Watkins, 193 N.J. 507, 513 (2008).  PTI, an alternative to criminal prosecution, provides supervisory treatment in lieu of criminal sentencing for defendants whose criminal activity can be deterred through such supervisory treatment.  Id. at 517–18.  To effectuate the purpose of PTI, “[e]ligibility is broad and includes all defendants who demonstrate the will to effect necessary behavioral change….” Watkins, supra, 193 N.J. at 513.  To effectively administer legislative vision of rehabilitation, as well as, to effectuate fair administration of justice, prosecutor can and does allow “out of time” PTI applications for worthy defendants.

Rule 3:28(h) twenty eight day requirement is also relaxed by N.J.S. 2C:43-12(e), allowing a referral to the program “[a]t any time prior to trial[.]” See also State v. Stafford, 2009 WL 838245 (2009) (rejecting a strict construction to the twenty eight (28) day timeline and directing the court below to “consider and decide defendant’s motion to permit the late filing of her application to the PTI program.“).

Based on the above, eligible applicant may seek the consent of the prosecutor and positive recommendations from the PTI director for admission into PTI to rehabilitate him/her and give an opportunity to be a constructive member of the society.

Share

Previous Post NYC Human Rights Commission Opposes to Disability Protections By Association

Next Post No Fly List

Yuri Starikov

Criminal Law

Diversion New Jersey State

Featuring Our Latest Video (Full Video Library at Vimeo.com/StarikovLaw)

https://vimeo.com/491866850?loop=0

Events

CUSTOMS BROKER LICENSE EXAM PREPARATION CLASSES for April 2021 Exam: January 7, 2021-March25, 2021.

Registration is Open at LawCustoms Store. Class details are available at Live Classes Page.

PUBLICATION CATEGORIES

  • Administrative Law
  • Consumer Protection Law
  • Contract Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Criminal Law
  • Employment Law
  • Health Law
  • Immigration Law
  • International Trade Law
  • Landlord-Tenant Law
  • Legal Profession
  • Tax Law
  • Training & Development

TOPICS & DISCUSSIONS

15 NYCRR 122 22 NYCRR 208 Affordable Care Act Antitrust Arbitration Bail CARES Act COVID-19 CPL 1.20 CPL 100.10 CPL 100.25 CPL 100.40 CPL 150.10 CPL 170.30 CPL 170.35 CPL 170.55 CPLR 213 CPLR 317 CPLR 3211 CPLR 3215 CPLR 5015 CPLR 6301 CPLR 6311 Diversion FOIA ICC Termination Act of 1995 Immigration and Nationality Act New Jersey State New York City New York City Human Rights Law New York State NYPL 15.15 NYPL 140.35 NYPL 145.00 NYPL 155.25 RPAPL 715 RPL 231 Rules of Professional Conduct Sentencing U.S. Constitution U.S. Federal UNIDROIT VTL 511 VTL 512 VTL 1807

Law Office of Yuri Starikov, LLC

157-11 Rockaway Blvd., Suite 209, Jamaica, NY 11434 | yuri@starikovlaw.com | + 1 (347) 871 2759

Subscribe to Publications & Newsletters

Loading

Disclaimer, Copyright and Licensing Terms

LEGAL DISCLAIMER
All postings on this website should not be treated as a legal advice. The information may be outdated and may reflect views that are different from the position of government officials or other persons. Certain statements may be construed as "Attorney Advertising." Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

COPYRIGHT
Except as otherwise noted, information on this website was written by Law Office of Yuri Starikov, LLC. The Office retains the copyright to its writings.

LICENSING
UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERIWISE, you may use Law Office of Yuri Starikov, LLC online publications subject to terms under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Under the license terms, you may use our Office web publications as you see fit, so long as you identify Law Office of Yuri Starikov, LLC as the source.

Creative Commons License

USEFUL LINKS

  • Federal Register
  • FindLaw
  • Google Scholar
  • Laws of New York
  • Public Library of Law
© 2020 Law Office of Yuri Starikov, LLC